Population Explosion in India? Get the Facts Straight

79

By Goodpal

See all 9 photos

Facts Indicate Continuous Decline in Population Growth

Current annual rate of population growth is estimated to be somewhere in the 1.4 – 1.7% range. About 4 – 5 decades ago, the population was growing at around 3% per year. There is all-round slowing down of the rate of population growth in all states of India. The average number of children per woman was about 6 in 1950’s, now it is less than 3. So, clearly there is nothing like population explosion in India. The fear psychosis of “Population Explosion” and “Population Bomb” generated by some Western intellectuals is just a reflection of their own feelings un-supported by facts on the ground. In fact, the growth rate of world's population has been continuously decreasing over recent decades.

The Malthusian assumption that high population growth necessarily leads to overcrowding, poverty, food shortage, environmental deterioration, and poor quality of life does not seem to hold any ground looking at the realities of last few decades. On the contrary, population growth can also be a major resource for economic growth. China and India are currently the fastest growing economies in the world. Therefore, the real issue should be “Population Development” and not “Size of the population”.

Why is the Indian population still increasing if the average family size is decreasing?

About 18 million people continued to be added every year in India because more than 50% of its population is in the reproductive age. It is this large base of young people that imparts momentum to the growth of population. Further, the high birth rates of the previous years also add the number of people in the reproductive age group. According to Population projections by the Registrar General of India, about 60% growth is due to momentum alone.

What exactly is population momentum?

Population momentum is the tendency for population growth to continue even after replacement-level fertility (2.1 children per woman) has been achieved. It is caused by a relatively high proportion of people in their childbearing years – by a population that is dominated by people in the reproductive age group. So, momentum operates through the population age distribution. It is important because of the magnitude and duration of its effects.

The importance of momentum as a cause of population growth has increased as fertility levels throughout the world have declined. In 1994, John Bongaarts estimated that population growth due to momentum could account for nearly half of world population increase during the twenty-first century.

Often there is a gap of few decades between achieving replacement level fertility (two children per couple) and population stabilization – when birth and death rates become equal. This is similar to stopping a car by applying breaks – it continues for some distance before coming to an halt.

India had set itself the goal of attaining replacement levels of fertility by 2010 to achieve the larger goal of population stabilization by 2045 - a gap of 35 years to account for population momentum. However, it will miss the target by a few years so population stabilization will be achieved around 2050 or beyond.

Is it possible to check population momentum?

Bongaart has pointed out that the momentum driven growth could be reduced simply by raising the average age of childbearing. He also calculated that a 2.5 year increase in age at first birth would reduce population growth momentum by 21%.

Typical ways to check population momentum are by delaying marriage and first pregnancy, and then by spacing births.

It is estimated that if all unwanted births were prevented, India’s TFR would drop to replacement level fertility (2.1).

A Concise History of World Population
Amazon Price: $30.00
List Price: $49.95
NOVA - World in the Balance: The Population Paradox
Amazon Price: $9.87
List Price: $19.95
World Killer
Amazon Price: $1.99

What are other factors contributing towards population growth?

Natural population increase is the difference between the number of births and deaths. Although both these rates are declining, but the birth rate is still remains high due to two factors. The first factor is births due to unwanted and/or unplanned pregnancies. These are children born due to lack of availability or poor access to contraceptive services. This is also known as the "unmet need". Here is how it can happen:

…one day my husband told me that he wanted a child after 2–3 years. I told him that I also want a child after 2–3 years. But he said that he did not know how not to have a child so he would ask someone, but then next month I found that I was pregnant. (18-year-old, first time pregnant woman in a small town in India)

And the second factor is the desire for larger families (also called "wanted fertility"). As education and awareness is increasing people are recognizing the importance of smaller family sizes. The wanted fertility comes from socio-cultural dimensions; for example, preference for a male child and high infant mortality. When parents are not sure of survival of all babies, they tend to have more number of children. Reduction of infant mortality rate by raising the quality of healthcare services and increase in awareness about reproductive health issues will ultimately take care of this issue.

Certainly, the birth and death rate dynamics is changing and India is at an important stage of demographic transition.

What is a demographic transition, in simple terms?

Stated simply, it is a transition from a stable population with high mortality and high fertility to a stable population with low mortality and low fertility. During the transition population growth and changes in the age structure of the population are inevitable. Most of India’s population growth in next two decades will be caused by increased numbers of people in the 15 to 59 years age group - the working age.

In India the demographic transition has been relatively slow but steady. As a result India was able to avoid adverse effects of too rapid changes in the number and age structure of the population, as is seen in China. Read, for example, The Dark Side of One Child Policy of China.

What one action can significantly reduce population momentum in India?

According to United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), raising mother’s age at first birth from 18 to 23 could reduce population momentum by over 40%.

Although the legal age of girl’s marriage in India is 18, it is not followed in several areas of the country. Many pockets of the country have tradition of child marriage. About 46% of young women marry before the legal age (18 years) and 63% by 20 years. The proportion of child marriage is significantly higher in rural areas of Bihar, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan as shown in the chart at the right.

Early marriage leads to early child birth. The young woman has hardly any idea about contraceptives and can’t delay pregnancy and end up giving birth within the first year of marriage. According to 2001 census, about three hundred thousand young girls below 15 years gave birth to at least one child in a rather economically better southern state of Karnataka.

Therefore, efforts to raise actual age at marriage will not only significantly reduce population momentum, it will also prevent ill effects of pregnancies at tender age.

So, how are the policy makers trying to control population momentum?

Historically, the Indian family planning efforts have revolved around permanent termination of pregnancy – sterilization. Over 96% of it is female sterilization. Currently, also this is the most popularly offered method of birth control. Needless to say it is totally unsuitable for those who are just starting families and for the growing population who enter into physical relationship outside the marriage. Their prime need is temporary contraceptives and spacing methods. It has been estimated that over 20% of all live births are the result of unplanned or un-timed pregnancies. In facts, abortion numbers provide another indication of the magnitude of the problem.

Sterilization, when available as the most offered choice, actually encourages people to have quick babies and then terminate permanently. Ironically, it actually adds to momentum, as has been argued previously. Indian family planning officials, so far, have failed to think on the line of controlling population momentum and still remain obsessed with sterilization and “targets of sterilization”.

They will have to go beyond clinical approach to population stabilization and fight the strength of momentum from the social plane. Because, it involves policy attempts to raise age at marriage, propagation of awareness about delaying first birth and then space further births. All these, in turn, need raising female education level, particularly in the rural areas, and empowering them through right knowledge of the pros and cons of various issues related to reproductive health.

Conclusion

All talks of population explosion or a population bomb ticking is India comes from 200 year old Malthusian thinking and does not stand the light of actual facts. No doubt, world population is increasing, particularly in the less developed world, but even globally the rate of population growth is slowing.

Rather than concentrating on sterilizing people, the population planners will do bigger justice if they focus on stemming the momentum aspect of population growth. Female education and delaying age at marriage are two best and dignified solutions to go about it. The traditional thinking of population control should be redefined in terms of population development, particularly of females.

Acknowledgement

This article is inspired by the one day roundtable held in New Delhi (Jan 12, 2011) on “Population and family Planning: Contemporary Challenges & Opportunities”, organized by the National Coalition on Population Stabilization, Family Planning & Reproductive Rights.

Thoughtful Comments

KRISHNA MURTY 10 months ago

NOW ANYBODY CAN DARE TO CHALLENGE THE POVERTY.

Poverty is not at all any curse. It is totally the lack of one's awareness. Plenty is everybody's birth right. Any sort of help from any corner, never makes the poor plenty. Mere ever long dreaming for better future will never become a reality. It is only the right Knowledge of awareness along with total determination, to overcome one's poverty, will only make the poor, plenty. Here is an assured hope for the poor to make their lifelong dream, easily, early, a reality. Now anybody can dare to challenge the poverty.

SRIMISSION'S "20 AWARENESS TIPS TO EASILY BECOME RICH” formula is a true blessing for majority of the poor, hungry, and suppressed population of the world. Please e-mail / give copy / pass on this information to all your well-wishers and the needy, to help us in spreading this noble message for the silent sufferers. How fast we spread this message, so fast poverty vanishes and peace prevails in the world.

For details visit website: www.srimission.org

Goodpal profile image

Goodpal Hub Author 12 months ago

Thanks Han, for your input. I can see that you favor the use of coercion as a way to population control and you are not alone in this approach. However, I would like to point out how thinking has changed after the ICPD of 1994 in Cairo.

The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) gave a new direction to the issue of population growth by shifting the focus from “population control” to the well being of women and their reproductive health – thus putting women at the center of the population debate.

It emphasized improving the living and health conditions of individual woman as a way to lower and stabilize the birth rate to solve the wider population problem. As a result, improvement in areas such as reproductive health, reproductive rights and empowerment of women became the main focus of the population issue after ICPD.

This is a significant shift from the earlier notion that women are merely a means to meet some predefined population growth in some specified time frame. Hence, countries have shifted away from “control” to “women development” and are working towards empowering women and improving their status and health conditions. Most women, given the choice, will have fewer children than their mothers did. In fact, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are also an extension of this approach.

I appreciate your viewpoint and thank you for sharing.

Han 13 months ago

Mr. Goodpal,

I think you need to understand that even if the population growth rate slows to 1%, the population is still growing. The point here is to reduce population.

What China is trying to achieve is not just to reduce growth rates, it is to reduce absolute numbers of people. You may think it is draconian and crude, but I think the only real way a population can be controlled properly is to use coercion in the initial stage until a certain time when the people will control themselves as seen in the case of Japan, Korea, Taiwan, HK and Singapore due to rising living standards.

Goodpal profile image

Goodpal Hub Author 13 months ago

Thanks Siddsingh, for your input.

I fully agree -- "Development" is the key word. While GDP growth of 8-9 percent looks good, it does not percolate down to the poor section. What is required is the promotion of small industries and entrepreneurship in the rural areas, rather than the current fashion of following American model of capitalism (basically designed to favor rich-and-powerful hoping they would create jobs for the lower class).

Thanks again for your thoughtful comment.

Goodpal profile image

Goodpal Hub Author 13 months ago

Thanks for your comment, Tony. I am fully in agreement with you.

Human race is depleting the natural resources irresponsibly and has caused dangerous damage to the climate worldwide. Global warming and thinning forest cover across the world would become greater issues with increasing world population in the coming decades.

A fresh initiative is needed to curb the defense expenditures worldwide. It would be wonderful if the UN can device a mechanism to extract a tax of 5-10 percent from the major superpowers and use that aggressively towards the MDGs. People of the world need better health, dignified living conditions, and human development.

Thanks again for your thoughtful comments.

SiddSingh profile image

SiddSingh 14 months ago

Great hub - well written with valid points.

However, I feel that though there is no population explosion, still we can't deviate to the other extreme - where we think that it is matter of no concern.

The biggest need of the hour is development, fast enough and sustainable enough so that the huge population does not indeed become a burden - and prove the grim Cassandras correct. Malthus was probably wrong in the sense that he did not take into account that technology can grow at a much faster pace, and play an important part in making food widely available.

Still, the fact remains that 35% of Indian population remains below the official poverty line - and 35% of of 1.2 billion is an obscenely large figure. THAT is one population that needs urgent attention.

tonymac04 profile image

tonymac04 14 months ago

You have highlighted the most important issues: "focusing on education, healthcare, and removal of economic disparity between few super-rich on one side and scores of ultra-poor on the other."

I think that the world's population is rapidly reaching a point where the resources will be stretched to breaking point. This will unfortunately lead to conflict over access. We already see signs of that.

I agree that there is fear-mongering in the West about India and China and I think the population issue needs to be addressed with some urgency - not pointing fingers at India and China, but doing concrete and useful things about education in particular. We know that the more educated a population is the lower the fertility rate and that is how the dangers of a world population of more than 7 billion people might be mitigated.

If the developed world (in which I would include China), and most especially the US, would devote a proportion of the money they currently spend on defence to the improvement of education in all countries across the world, they would find they don't need the massive defence budgets they currently have.

Development is the key and hence the importance of the UN's MDGs.

Thanks for a very thoughtful and thought-provoking Hub.

Love and peace

Tony

Goodpal profile image

Goodpal Hub Author 15 months ago

Thank you safiq, for the comment. All the hype of population explosions from the West where people feel threatened by seeing big number of people. The current economic growth rate of India adds fuel to their fear. It is all world politics. Twenty years from now US, China, and India will be the superpowers deciding world politics.

The real issue is how India develops its masses, particularly those living in rural areas and assimilate them in the mainstream economic development. The trick lies in focusing on education, healthcare, and removal of economic disparity between few super-rich on one side and scores of ultra-poor on the other. Population numbers, in themselves, don't decide the growth of a country.

safiq ali patel profile image

safiq ali patel 15 months ago

I don't think that a population explosion is a bad thing. India needs its children and many of them for it to be india. I personally would like to see an india full of people rather than the sort of India I have been seeing recently where the number of people in the country is in sharp decline.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working